Re: calling thin, part 2
My thought process was similar. Villain had been isolating UTG+1 all night (I probably should have mentioned before), so I think he would have raised with 77 or 99. 97s is too weak for him to limp in early position (especially because the table was moderately aggressive), and he'd never limp with 73 or 93. So that leaves a lot of 9Xs type hands, and a set of 3s. I've got 4 outs to the nuts, and getting 7:1 I need to come up with another 2 or so to make this a call. I figured that a J or T would be good often enough to justify it, but you make a good point about the RIO that creates.
|