[niss]

I thought I read that Armitage wasn't charged because Libby's actions rendered it basically impossible to charge him with a crime. If this is correct, then your idea that this was nothing more than "a perjury trap" makes no sense (and I've never heard of a "perjury trap" to begin with).

In addition, care to cite the source of that article? I trust it is from an unbiased source.

And the idea that this is all the work of some rogue US Attorney who had some vendetta against the government -- in an era when merely glancing wrong at the government got US Attorneys fired -- is preposterous.