[ChicagoRy]

This probably has not been discussed much here, but I am wondering what everybody looks at when deciding how good somebody is on a pure statistical standpoint.

To keep things simple, we can stick to anything Sharkscope can filter for.

What I mean by this, what are the most important categories of information that you need to make an accurate judgement on how good or bad a player is?

Also, if there is something important that Sharkscope does not cover please list that as well.

Some examples of what I am looking for in responses is "I feel average stake and ROI are the two most important things that factor into how good a player is when judging him statistically."

Also, let us assume that these stats are all filtered for HU (as you can do if you buy Sharkscope).

If you're not clear about what I'm asking, post and ask questions please.

Thanks.