Re: Nate\'s Theorem on the \"Value Bluff\"
[ QUOTE ]
im not sure, but are you insinuating we find a game-theory style which makes bets against every possible villain so that it is inexploitably +ev? if so, doesnt this ignore all reads which influence the decision?
[/ QUOTE ]
I've increasingly come to believe that a starting point for a poker strategy is to find a game theoretically sound strategy (rather than a "solid" strategy), and then to deviate from that as needed when you do have reads.
|