Re: mathematics of poker X months later?
i'm getting thru it on vacation and think it is really, really good..... and you somewhat can overlook the math. i basically take the math as given and skim over it (looking more at the assumptions), but there is tons of content independent of the math.
BTW, showed it to a top economics professor who knows some about poker and he thought it was a great book.
is very sketchy.
what is bill chan's full-time job? his bio seems to be purposely vague.
|