Re: Nate\'s Theorem on the \"Value Bluff\"
nate,
all your posts in this forum are amazing. keep posting.
i feel these "value-bluffs" are something many of us do intuitively when making thinner bluffs/vbets anyway. we all realize that at times we will call/fold better/worse but in the overall scheme, it is +ev.
im not sure, but are you insinuating we find a game-theory style which makes bets against every possible villain so that it is inexploitably +ev? if so, doesnt this ignore all reads which influence the decision?
|