Re: Back To The Shoe Argument
Bingo. I take back everything I ever said about you.
Putting it slightly differently. First remember that I define evidence as "anything that changes the price". Now remember that I postulated a trial of 1,000,000 people where EVIDENCE is identical. Not everything about them. Including at this point the shoe size. Thus the million defendents would not all have to have the same size shoe as the defendent.
What's the chances that luckyme would find a flaw in a professional mathmetician's argument about Baye's Theorem? This tells me there may indeed be a God.
|