Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure that this thread is meant to point out the futility of arguing with someone about anything after they've rejected the key evidence. Well done.
Person A: Gravity exits.
Person B: Not everywhere.
Person A: What?
Person B: Not on Pluto.
Person A: What the hell are you talking about?
Person B: Have you ever been to Pluto? I didn't think so! We have no idea if there's gravity there or not.
Person A: Well, it still orbits the sun.
Person B: You haven't even seen Pluto.
Person A: Well, it's pretty obvious that we have gravity here.
Person B: Who cares if we experience some local phenomenon? They don't have it in Antarctica.
Person A: You gotta be [censored] me.
Person B: How else do you explain penguins?
Person A: What the hell do they have to do with gravity?
Person B: That's exactly the question that I'm raising with the Pluto example!
Person A: So you're trying to use penguins as another Pluto. I've seen penguins, and they obey gravity.
Person B: Please provide me with a mechanism for showing why a penguin that you've seen has anything to do with a penguin in Antarctica.
Person A: Ok. Now you're just being retarded. Why are you so smug?
Person B: Why shouldn't I be? You're the one who can't back up your unscientific beliefs.
[/ QUOTE ]
so what you are saying is penguins are to blame for gravity? Or that pluto caused 9/11?
|