[pizarro1]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Boosted told him that it was a '100% no loss' agreement ...

[/ QUOTE ]

Staking a winning player like Boostedj is a sweet deal.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]


him: lemme throw this out there
him: I dont know exactly when these guys are going to pay
him: I would think in a week or two
him: instead of loaning me money
him: would you like some of my action and just BR me on FTP until I get my funds released?
him: stake me and I'll provide makeup if I lose
him: that way it's 100% no loss for you
me: whoa
me: what's in it for you though?
him: I borrowed 10k from someone else
him: and they are freaking out
him: that I'm playing 1 table of 25/50 ring
him: so it might be easier just to deal with you
him: and that way
him: I dont feel bad borrowing 30k from you
him: and I can play more freely
me: okay sure
me: sounds like a win win situation for both of us


[/ QUOTE ]

It was incredbibly naive of the OP to think that he could loan the money and receive 50% of the profits. However isn't it more then clear that Boosted hustled him into it? OP had no idea what was really going on, and Boosted knew that.

How can Boosted confirm it's a win-win situation for both of them without blatantly lying?

Edit: Boosted didn't confirm this in the chat above. I wanted to point out what the OP thought. I presume he never replied to that statement, for obvious reasons.