View Single Post
  #516  
Old 05-21-2007, 11:38 AM
pizarro1 pizarro1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 83
Default Re: 60k \"Staking\" dispute

[ QUOTE ]
I'm really surprised by the reaction of the posters in general.

It maybe be difficult to understand at first but after reading the Boostedj posts I think everything is pretty clear.

The.Filth should realize it was nonsense to think it was a loan AND also he was getting part of the profit. So the deal was a stake. And if you stake someone is your money what is on the tables.

Also, I'm sure that if The.Filth had gone through all of this more carefully he could had negotiated a good agreement with Boostedj. As his credibility is clearly worth a lot for him.

regards,

dardo

[/ QUOTE ]

However OP was under the impression that that it wasn't. Boosted told him that it was a '100% no loss' agreement, OP didn't know what a 'make up' meant and Boosted took advantage of that naivety. Besides making the false '100% no loss' statement, Boosted would be right technically. However this is a very shady thing of Boosted to do. From what, I understand that guy basicly sent his entire roll to Boosted. I cannot understand how someone can claim his reputation is so valuable to him and yet pull a thing like this.