[ikestoys]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm actually grunching this, how wierd is that...

Given your read that he is a terrible player, I very much doubt he is checking a hand twice to induce you to bet a worse hand. The river VB seems great. I'd probably bet a bit more however.

[/ QUOTE ]

in order for the bet to have value, the villain must call with something we beat here once in a while. Otherwise it is just a bluff

[/ QUOTE ]

This is obvious...I am not sure what you are getting at here. The point of the thread was whether or not there was value in the bet.

While this is read dependent, I will assume your vote is for checking behind.

[/ QUOTE ]

nah, i misread grunch's post... I thought he was saying we should bet b/c we obv have the best hand. Bet away.