confused with the reason for the post ?
I am confused as does this post mean that ed miller standing with two plus two is on the line?
I would call this thread arnold criticisms of ed miller, for when I read this title I Thought to myself "oh no professional no limit volume one is in trouble"
I am glad to see that is not the case, still is it so other two plus two forum readers and posters can rebutt arnold claims? or was this post a way for another point of view for no limit can be given ?.
can you clarify this for me mason.
|