View Single Post
  #24  
Old 05-01-2007, 06:54 PM
pokerstudAA pokerstudAA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 1,597
Default Re: \"True M\" vs. Harrington\'s M: Critical Flaws in Harrington\'s M Theo

Coming to post at 2+2 to promote your book and spouting this crap: [ QUOTE ]
”Zolotow’s “CPR” articles were simply a couple of columns he wrote last year in which he did nothing but explain Harrington’s M theory, as if it were 100% correct. He added nothing to the theory of M, and is clearly as ignorant of the math as Harrington is."

[/ QUOTE ]

Arnie - you come off as a wanna-be intellectual douche who makes himself feel better by putting down others. Harrington's ideas are well respected and I highly doubt he is ignorant of the math involved.

As someone else said:
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe next time, go with "Clarifying M: An Alternative Method for Calculation and Usage".

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote