Re: Jamie Gold\'s mistake in WSOP 2006
[ QUOTE ]
Things like that happen all the time, and they aren't questionable ethicly speaking. They are common practice. Basically, they'd negotiate some sort of split (would be good for Jamie because Wasicka had like no chance at that point) and then they'd keep playing the tournament.
FyteOn, I agree with everything but #3. They'd keep playing, and Gold would still have won, so it wouldn't matter.
#4 is the most important. The agreement is for whatever Gold won, so the deal with Wasicka would be incorporated in this.
[/ QUOTE ]
1. I can't believe I'm even reading this thread.
2. I can't believe I'm responding to it.
3. I can't believe this response is even necessary.
4. By what agreement between Gold and Leyser can you envision it being remotely ethical for Gold to negotiate a deal with Wasicka essentially to screw Leyser out of the agreed split? You are proposing that Gold bribe Wasicka to participate in scamming Leyser, no?
|