Re: Jamie Gold\'s mistake in WSOP 2006
Things like that happen all the time, and they aren't questionable ethicly speaking. They are common practice. Basically, they'd negotiate some sort of split (would be good for Jamie because Wasicka had like no chance at that point) and then they'd keep playing the tournament.
FyteOn, I agree with everything but #3. They'd keep playing, and Gold would still have won, so it wouldn't matter.
#4 is the most important. The agreement is for whatever Gold won, so the deal with Wasicka would be incorporated in this.
|