Re: 27% Full Tilt Offer
[ QUOTE ]
If you put $4000 into the rake, and clear and $1100 bonus, then your new MGR or rake would be 2900$ and you would get 27% of that + your 1100$ bonus. Take a look at the example below.
This is taken from MuckWinners on another post:
Assuming you have $4000 MGR for the month AND clear an $1100 bonus in the same month AND play EXACTLY Breack-even poker::
A) NO Rakeback, Bonus ONLY -- you get $1100
B) Rakeback ONLY -- $4000 x 27% = $1080
c) Rakeback AND Bonus -- ($4000 - $1100) x 27% = $783 + $1100 = $1883.
D) You received rakeback AND the bonus with NO MGR deduction -- $1100 + $1080 = $2180
Therefore, the $1100 MGR deduction costs -- $2180 - $1883 = $297.
Since Option D is not really an option, choose between A, B, and C. Which one would you rather have??
[/ QUOTE ]
Using the example above, and adding to it the Ironman freeroll which has an overlay of Ca$191 how would the figures work out at the levels I am used to?.
Example, I'm staying about 40% ahead of the bonus whilst coasting into the bronze (possibly silver) freeroll. But going by my numbers this month I would expect to be under the freeroll overlay so something like this. $200 in rake, $100 in bonus and facing the freeroll. Would my figures look like this: Rakeback AND Bonus -- ($200 - $100 -$191) x 27% = $-24.57 (or $0) + $100 = $75.43. and if so which of the following would apply (assuming break even poker)
A- My FT balance would benefit from the $100 bonus and be in the black
B- My rakeback account would be <u>minus</u> $24.57
C- My rakeback account being $0
D- My rakeback defecit being taken from my FT $100 bonus making it $75.43
And finally, if I opt for the medals and do not spend them would my rakeback be uneffected? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|