View Single Post
  #23  
Old 04-05-2007, 06:16 PM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BEHIND YOU
Posts: 12,323
Default Re: Inappropriate Avatar?

I would let the rapist avatar stand, unless Ribbo starts complaining about it.

WRT the snowman avatar, I agree with AJ. He has it hosted on a photobucket account with a random name, so there are no ties to any racist website or propaganda or anything.

[ QUOTE ]
Its not two little girls making fun of Hitler, its two little girls idolizing Hitler.

[/ QUOTE ]
Regardless, it looks like two girls making fun of Hitler, to anybody except those that actually know where it came from.

[ QUOTE ]
We removed a cactus that looked like a swastika and that was a coincidence.

[/ QUOTE ]
That whole situation was completely laughable.

[ QUOTE ]
I am all for free speech, but if Ed wants to express support for Prussian Blue then he should do it on his own website, not 2+2 - which is owned by people of Jewish decent - ironic isn't it?

[/ QUOTE ]
The only irony in this statement is in the first 6 words.

[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, I'm tempted to ban him myself for the avatar.

[/ QUOTE ]
Settle the hell down. A ban would be totally inappropriate, without at least a PM dialog beforehand.

All that said, the WWMMD principle does say that it should probably go.
Reply With Quote