[Tom Bayes]

Thanks for posting. I don't have time to go through the paper right now, but I've downloaded it and hope to read it in the near future. It looks likes the mathematical level is beyond the Chen/Ankenmann book, so if you found The Mathematics of Poker tough, you probably won't like this article. I have no idea at this point if the guy is using realistic poker scenarios or assumptions and whether or not there is anything of value (beyond academic interest) to a typical poker player in this work.