[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Niet: you're right: if most anarchocapitalists "recognize" that no monopolies would exist without a state, it's pretty hard to see why
any monopolies would exist without a state.
With logic like that, it's surprising you guys haven't convinced
everyone.
[/ QUOTE ]
The logic explaining how monopolies cannot arise and last without a state is something that has been gone over before in this forum in depth.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, obviously if the ACists in the Politics forum have settled the issue, there's no point in discussing it anymore.
[ QUOTE ]
Nietz simply pointed out the glaring flaw in your inane hypothetical. Your smarmy attitude is getting old. If you want to actually learn something (and its clear you have a lot to learn) then start acting like an adult.
[/ QUOTE ]
Val, why don't we take your personal attacks to
this thread, so we don't derail late's thread any further.
PS - It's funny how ACists switch from "you can't prove it WON'T work" when defending their own theory, to "the onus is on YOU," when attacking somebody else's.