Re: Quantifying the accuracy of tells
You're "wrong" in that your previous 2 posts contained nothing that accuratly represents anything about poker. Or perhaps I should say you were neither right nor wrong per se as the posts made little sense. If you really want an example:
[ QUOTE ]
Making edge decisions based on a mathematical equation is exploitable. Correct?
[/ QUOTE ]
This statement is more or less meaningless.
What is an "edge decision"? Why do you believe it is explitable if the decision is made using an equation? What if that "equation" represented the Nash equilibrium play in a given situation? What if it was a last to act call/fold decision, and as such your opponent cannot act again and thus can't exploit it.
In other words, your comment was more or less nonsensical.
|