View Single Post
  #41  
Old 03-14-2007, 11:11 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: Public Health Care - Why not at state level first?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Who said anything about "great" care? Begging the question 101.

[/ QUOTE ]

Relax man, I'm not some socialist who thinks government health care is automatically awesome. I probably should have said "better" if that would make you happy.

[/ QUOTE ]

NT RLY. That's still begging the same question.


[/ QUOTE ]

I meant one state's hypothetical free health care being better than another state's free health care, not necessarily better than private health care. Jeez, it's like your just looking for any statist bias to bash when it's not even there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fine, I agree with you then. But when you said "I'm not some socialist who thinks government health care is automatically awesome. I probably should have said "better"..." I presumed you were still applying the adjective "better" (instead of "great" or "awesome") to "government health care". You never made it clear until now you were comparing one social system to another and not to an unregulated market. I'll withdraw this particular objection now that you've made it clear what you meant.
Reply With Quote