Re: This business of adjusting to the ante structure
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...There is no point at which the ante becomes the dominating factor, and that's really all I've been trying to say here.
[/ QUOTE ]
If by "ante" you mean the sum of parts making up the structure of the game (ante amount, size of bring-in relative to ante pool, size of bring-in relative to complete bet), then I disagree. For the comparison to be meaningful, we have to assume the same opponents in each game, so reads are immaterial.
[/ QUOTE ]
No, that's not the correct comparison at all. The correct comparison is to see what makes more of a difference, holding the opponents constant while varying the structure, or holding the structure constant while varying the opponents.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well this thread was never about what you have now decided that it is about.
This thread was about the OP denying that ante size makes much of a difference in optimal strategy.
The question of whether you make bigger adjustments for the ante or for opponents seems completely pointless to me, and in fact it's not even answerable. (How are you supposed to quantify these adjustments to weigh against each other anyway?)
|