[jek187]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Implementing limits on the number of tables each player can play would be a really dumb move by the poker sites. Multitabelers will just move some of their business to other sites rather than reduce the number of tables they are playing. Ex: if someone 8 tables FTP and FTP reduces the number of tables to 4 then that player will just play 4 tables on FTP and 4 on stars now. The only thing that FTP has accomplished is lose business.

[/ QUOTE ]


QFT

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you guys play 1 table on Pacific and X number elsewhere when Pacific only allowed 1 table? How many people do you know that did that? You're vastly overestimating the percentage of people that will multi-site.

As for if reducing the number of HUDBots on your site is a good for the bottom line, that is something that's very much unknown (and depends largely on the site's current situation) so saying all they would accomplish with this policy is lose business, has a very high probability of being wrong .

[/ QUOTE ]

It has the same probability of being right.

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you basing that on? I've read lots of arguments about this, but I've never seen anyone argue it's something close to 50/50. From my experience in the industry, I'd say that dropping HUDBots from 8 tables to 4 would boost the sites' profit in over 90% of the cases.

[ QUOTE ]
So you saying it has a high probability of being wrong is in fact wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

Even in your case of it being 50% correct, I consider 50 compared to 0 a high probability.