Re: 9 person tables
[ QUOTE ]
I also recently started playing more on full tilt recently. I like the 9-handed games, makes me feel just a little more in control of the situation.
11k hands is a solid sample. Kind of a long time to be running bad. Playing shorthanded your small PP, Axs, suited connectors are less valuable. I don't know how much that makes a difference with just one less player. But if you're limping those hands EP a lot maybe it's a problem. Should be easy to check your BB/hand for those hands with pokertracker. Also, how does ft rake compare to rake at the other sites where you play?
[/ QUOTE ]
I definitely would not consider 9 players a SH table. Limping small-med PPs and Axs in EP is just table dependant.
Flick,
I would just chalk this up to running bad if you are confident your game is strong. Just post some hands if you are not sure about them or think they are interesting. If you PM me your FT screen name, I can check what PT stats I have on you and any notes I have if you are curious.
|