[MagCFO]

I totally agree that there is a transparency issue that needs to be addressed, but to me, it's pretty obvious the GT due diligence was very weak.

There are no statements at all from Michael B. Did they even speak to him?

They didn't even talk to anyone in SF, where the PPA spends most of it's time. The GT letter acts as if the DC office is the main office, which it is not. And, when was the DC office visited? During a congressional session or not? Pretty important piece of information...don't you think?

I just think it will come out that:

A - no one from GT even spoke to Michael B about this issue before releasing the letter

and

B - they visited the wrong freak'n office and didn't even realize it.

Both of those things like really bad for GT IMO, and I have a family member who works for GT, so I have no agenda against them.