[okietalker]

The simple fact of the matter is, PPA still could get an endorsement by 2+2. All they need to do is take care of all the transparency issues and the information disclosed will be the determining factor as to whether or not 2+2 publicly endorses the PPa or not.

I for one, would like to thank Mason for taking the time and under going the expense of getting the report he did get.

IMHO, the responsibility for the reports lack of substance falls directly on the PPA. If the PPA had been more transparent from the start, then, 2+2 may have already publicly endorsed them.

I guess I just see this in much simpler terms than most of the other posters in this thread.

2+2 has proven to me that they are a class act by doing what they have.

PPA has proven to me that they need to get with the program ASAP. I would like to believe they are an honest organization, but would also like the proof to verify this myself. Was it Reagan who said "Trust, but Verify" ?

Thanks for letting me share my thoughts.