[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

What's the difference between "anarcho-capitalist" and "traditional anarchist"?

fwiw, i think i'm both.

[/ QUOTE ]

A traditional Anarchist does not define the entire world in terms of possessions.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nor does an ACer.

[/ QUOTE ]

ACists only have their possession. It's a fundamental tenet of capitalism, and from that premise ACists build their world.

[/ QUOTE ]


English plz. What does 'only have their posession' mean? And no, AC is constructed through negative rights, so there are no tenets. If you're talking about epistimology, then those aren't tenets either.

A simple example, that you could have come up with yourself, is that an ACer does not claim that anyone owns the earth's core, or some area of water or land that's not turned into valuable use.