[stump5727]

Its seems as though that a perfect game theory is unbeatable the psychology but not unbeatable (through perhaps sheer luck, or another optimal game theory), does that mean there’s a more specific game theory is maybe more optimal?

I guess my main question is that one of the arguments is stating that perfect game theory is unbeatable, that mean against a psychologist, correct?

My next question is, is a game theory always constant whether full table, short table, or heads up, then does it take into affect stack size or is this all part of the optimal game strategy?

And lastly is optimal game strategy for efficiency or consistency?