[dknightx]

[ QUOTE ]
I confirm that FTPDoug has sent me comprehensive details about all of the games played by the first account that ericjones had. Six of the players from whom he won substantial sums, in different sessions over a period of five days, have later had their accounts locked for credit card fraud.

I was told that the same computer was used by ericjones' second account, as well as two other players who have both since had their accounts locked for credit card fraud.

His second account was involved in play with one player, over three sessions, who has since had his account locked for credit card fraud.

Assuming all the information is true, (and I have been given times, names, numbers of hands, and amounts involved; not hand numbers nor histories), in my opinion, it is absolutely obvious that anyone seeing this information would agree that ericjones was the intended recipient of funds obtained by credit card fraud, and it was only after having received a very considerable sum that he played legitimate games, presumably as "cover play" before attempting to withdraw the money.

FTPDoug has stated that he has given me the details in strictest confidence and he has asked that I do not reveal specific information. Obviously, I will honour his request, and I am therefore unable to add anything further.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm not here to say eric is innocent ... but unless FTP provides you with the actual hand histories, we are still at square 1. This information is not any different than what FTPDoug said the first time around ... except now they gave you some numbers that support their claims. but where did these numbers come from? are they accurate? do we honestly think FTP would (at this point) tell us if they made an error?

The only piece of real "damning" evidence that has been provided is that 2 other accounts (which were later flagged for CC fraud) were played from the same computer as eric ... but heres the question, were these 2 computers responsible for "chip dumping" eric? if so, how is that possible?