Re: Female+sexy+skeptic = 1 in a million? // Men are better than wo
Returning to OP's original question for a moment....
They aren't as rare as you make them sound, if the students and faculty of the math and geology departments at the university I attended can be taken as an indication... a minority, yes, but they were outnumbered significantly less than 10:1. (And some of the men wouldn't count as "male sexy skeptic" etc to be suitable matches for them, frankly -- you could argue the eligible pool down to only a 2:1 or 3:1 advantage.)
The basic problem is that if the quality women are outnumbered even slightly by the quality men it becomes obvious right away: those of us who have a woman keep a tight hold on her to keep your grubby mitts off her ass, and if there are (say) 1100 men and 1000 women in this boat -- when a new woman comes on the market all 100 men left out in the cold tend to mob her.
---
Now, what's REALLY rare, are these sexy intelligent women who ALSO are prepared to have a good number of kids to make sure that the next generation doesn't consist entirely of illiterate breeders. Being "responsible" about reproduction is a recipe for evolutionary disaster, so long as the intelligent are and the masses aren't.
|