[alphatmw]

since i don't know much about game theory except its basic concept, i'll have to ask someone to expand on this. what exactly constitutes perfect game theory in heads up poker, and what's stopping any game theorist from reaching this level? if such a level is unattainable (as i would assume is so, or else there would be lots of unbeatable heads up players right now, no?) then how would you change your answer to my question?