[maurile]

[ QUOTE ]
Second, what source do you have for the certainty of your opinions ... "evidence is so compelling" ... "judge has to conclude that Leyser's account is much, much, closer to the truth than Gold's."

[/ QUOTE ]
A good source would be Gold's declaration. Gold admits that Leyser came up with a few celebrities, and Gold also admits that Gold promised Leyser a share of his winnings.

The poster you're responding to is inferring from those facts that there was a quid pro quo -- that neither one was just doing the other a favor as a gift.

[ QUOTE ]
Remember that Leyser has the burden of proof -- he has to prove their was consideration. How can he do that without something from Bodog?

[/ QUOTE ]
By testifying directly on that issue. It's not hard to imagine that Leyser's testimony will be more believable than Gold's.