Re: Romo or Bledsoe?
[ QUOTE ]
Like all teams that have crap offensive lines, it doesn't matter who they play, they're still screwed. For that matter, the opposite is true. If they had a good offensive line, it wouldn't matter either, they could win with either one. There is basically no difference between the #5 and #25 QB. Look at basically every team that is good and every team that is bad. All the good teams have good o-lines (at least by reputation) and the same is true for the bad teams that all have bad o-lines. This has also been true when you look at SB's over the past couple of decades, heck, Dallas is the best example, they had the sickest line in the league. Same can be said that good dline basically = good defense, although this isn't as important to winning really. QB, WR, RB, CB, barely even matter unless you have somebody really awful filling in-there are a large # of guys at these positions that are very close to league average, and a much wider distribution of talent up front.
[/ QUOTE ]
This is absurd. There is no position that is more important to a team's success than QB.
Trade Bledsoe for Manning and the Cowboys would be 6-0 and the Colts 2-4.
|