Re: Any comments on this NL freezeout tourney structure?
"Pretty big jump at level 8, I'd rather see 400/800 then 400/800/100."
I was wondering if someone would pick up on that right away.
"Did you kill the antes at 13 because it'll most likely be HU at that point?"
It had BETTER be HU or a tricycle at that point! These 2-hour final table are running pretty late for a weeknight game.
Two other ideas, with the second based on your comments:
5- T150/300
6- T200/400 25 ante
7- T300/600 50 ante
10:45 - break, color up greens
8- T400/800 100 ante
9- T500/1000 100 ante
10- T700/1500 100 ante
11- T1000/2000 300 ante
12- T1500/3000 500 ante
13- T2500/5000 no ante
or, as you suggested:
8- T400/800 no ante
9- T500/1000 100 ante
10- T700/1500 200 ante
I think it's still a pretty brutal progression between rounds 7 and 10 in the second structure, even with dropping the round 8 antes. However, with the players presumably dropping out as well, the total round cost shouldn't be doubling each round.
With either change, I'm a little concerned about the SB odds in the middle rounds.
Thoughts on either adjustment?
|