[Mason Malmuth]

Hi Deakon:

I see your point. But the reason I decided to revisit was the idea that this book had unique mathematics in it which could not be disputed. So I thought it was important to show that was not the case.

In addition, understanding how to properly frame problems from a probability/gambling standpoint is key to being successful at what it is all of us are interested in. So while I do sort of agree with you that The Poker Tournament Formula has been discussed enough, it still seemed important from my point of view to address this issue.

best wishes,
Mason