View Single Post
  #16  
Old 08-12-2006, 10:48 AM
Troll_Inc Troll_Inc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: FGHIJKLM STUVWXYZ
Posts: 2,566
Default Re: ****OFFICIAL LOW CONTENT THREAD v.1****

Anyone want to help me analyze my year so far?

(that made it to Pokertracker)
I've got 13,500 hands at PLO25, 4 BB/100, $260 profit, $740 rake
5,500 at PLO50, 10 BB/100, $560 profit $435 rake
440 at PLO100, 6 BB/100, $60 profit, $48 rake
15 at PLO200, 146 BB/100, $88 profit, $5 rake (I must have been drinking to play PLO200.)

2/5 Live 10 hrs, $600 profit, no idea on rake, but probably $50 in drink tips.

The PLO25 numbers are greatly skewed due to a lot of learning that went on. I had a better winrate before I started reading 2+2. Probably a waste of time to play PLO25 with rake, and since I have enough numbers to be fairly certain I can beat PLO50.

I'm playing mostly PLO50 right now and playing well. Since May 1, I have a 15 BB/100 with $800 profit. I'm rolled to play some PLO100 as per most bankroll suggestions and TheRempel's bankroll/game chart. But I think want to play a lot more hands at PLO50 before trying to make PLO100 my regular game. Any of you conservative players base moving up on number of hands played? I'm thinking I want at least 15,000 at PLO50 before a move.

My reasoning on basing moving up on a number of hands, is the stories I've seen of dudes that go on a winstreak (in holdem), they are then rolled for a game that they may or may not be able to beat. By playing a lot more hands at a level before moving up, you should have a better idea of "where you are at".