[Phanekim]

his lawyers and doctors will have a good case and can bring up a good amount of reasonable doubt.

he , like most journalists, and cyclists and everyone who is not even remotely "in the know" and yet still writing their opinions need to shut up.

I mean the by line of "synthetic" testosterone...of many articles...man...thats millions of dollars in damages right there. I might put up a better outline of their defense...John Eustice of espn did a great job of pointing out disrepencies.

The reason why i believe floyd is testosterone is not something you quite cheat with. its basically a steroid. they help recovery thus you can work out more and harder thus getting stronger.

But the lawyers and doctors have acess to sensitive information. Just from what espn and other sources like velonews cyclingnews etc etc have written...I think they have a very reasonable case.