Re: Theory of Poker -- Obvious information and boring as hell to read
When I read Newton's laws of motion it's very "DUH" type stuff to me now. It wasn't in Newton's day and he was a genius for it (among other things).
That having been said, I think there is still alot in ToP that even good/great players haven't thought about (or haven't thought about enough or properly).
Oh and 10+1 SNG's are not "real" poker because you suck at them?
|