Re: Easy folds vs. weak-tight
Hand 1 I usually peel one more and fold unimproved against all but the laggiest.
Hand 2, here are a couple of PokerStoves to chew on:
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 50.0379 % 49.82% 00.22% { 88 }
Hand 2: 49.9621 % 49.74% 00.22% { 22+, A2s+, K9s+, QTs+, JTs, A5o+, KTo+, QJo }
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 39.6110 % 39.31% 00.30% { 88 }
Hand 2: 60.3890 % 60.09% 00.30% { 44+, A5s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, A8o+, KJo+, QJo }
From this point in the hand, if you just blindly called down and he bet every street, you're getting 11-5. So, obviously, if his range is as wide as the first PStove run, then calling down is prudent, assuming an ace doesn't hit.
And as long as he doesn't play position very well, calling down against the more moderate hand range when no ace hits is also profitable.
Luke
|