Forum: Health and Fitness
06-05-2007, 11:55 AM
|
Replies: 77
Views: 267
|
Forum: Poker Theory
06-03-2007, 08:05 AM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 89
Re: Toy Game Question
You're missing the point. Think of it this way - you hold JJ in the BB. You know what the SB raises with, and what he calls with. WHat is your EV if he holds a calling hand and calls? What is...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
06-01-2007, 04:58 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 89
Re: Toy Game Question
Found an error in my analysis, and have corrected.
The corrected answers are:
1) Raise
2) TT
3) AA-TT, AKs-A9s, AKo-ATo
The SB raising hands are unchanged.
This seems (at least to me) to be...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
06-01-2007, 12:25 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 89
Re: Toy Game Question
Hubris,
I agree with what you say. I also agree with my point. Trying to reconcile the two has made me lose sleep last night (yes, I take these things WAY too seriously, but I love these math /...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-30-2007, 06:12 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 89
Re: Toy Game Question
In closing, I find it surprising that the only hands the BB holds in which he's hoping the SB raises are:
- AA to QQ
- AKs to AJs
- AKo to AJo
way counter-intutive....
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-30-2007, 12:40 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 89
Re: Toy Game Question
Yes, the BB is getting 3:1 to call a raise. I stated this incorrectly as 5:1, but my analysis correctly used 3:1. However, there is no hand the BB should fold to a raise. Using the hand...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-29-2007, 03:27 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 89
Re: Toy Game Question
I'm working my way through Chen's book, and the toy game is something I contrived to determine if I'm understanding the material.
Here's my solution to the Toy Game:
1) Call
2) JJ
3) AA to QQ,...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-27-2007, 12:48 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 89
Toy Game Question
Toy game:
- Heads up, 1/2 blind structure
- SB can fold, call, or raise.
- BB can call or fold.
- NO further betting.
Questions:
1) BB holds TT. Is he hoping SB calls or raises?
2) What...
|
Forum: Books and Publications
07-08-2005, 12:45 PM
|
Replies: 250
Views: 3,109
Re: Review of Ace on the River
I agree 100% with Boondoggle's comments regarding Barry's book. That being said, I consider the $25 well spent for no other purpose that to determine, via all that's been said and written about the...
|
Forum: High Stakes Limit
05-06-2005, 02:06 AM
|
Replies: 465
Views: 32,386
Re: DERB
You have better things to do with your time - I can respect that. However, if I (or anyone else) are going to draw valid conclusions from what you (or anyone else) say in this chain, then what you...
|
Forum: High Stakes Limit
05-06-2005, 01:53 AM
|
Replies: 465
Views: 32,386
Re: DERB
He doesn't need to show me the data - if his experience is good enough for him, that's fine. However, with all due respect, I remain unconvinced unless I can see the data for myself. Otherwise, it...
|
Forum: High Stakes Limit
05-06-2005, 12:50 AM
|
Replies: 465
Views: 32,386
Re: DERB
Show me the data to support this statement.
|
Forum: High Stakes Limit
05-06-2005, 12:07 AM
|
Replies: 465
Views: 32,386
Re: DERB
Very plausible. However, I believe that the possibility of highly sophisticated team play cannot be ignored. I would humbly suggest that this forum needs to seriously and methodically address this...
|
Forum: High Stakes Limit
05-05-2005, 05:42 PM
|
Replies: 465
Views: 32,386
Re: DERB
Some stats, using J_V's original numbers:
[ QUOTE ]
Don't ever run bad. Party 30/60 player:
{{Hands 73,824 - VIP 30 - R 17 - NF 21 - ag 2.0
Total winnings: $114,281
Routinely 3 bets...
|