Two Plus Two Newer Archives
>
Search Forums
Search Results
FAQ
Community
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search
Community Links
Members List
Search Forums
Show Threads
Show Posts
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
>
Last
»
Showing results 1 to 25 of 107
Search took
0.01
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
Jerrod Ankenman
Forum:
Books and Publications
11-11-2007, 10:14 PM
Replies:
35
The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...
Views:
343
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Traditional risk of ruin says, for a 300 bet bankroll:
ror = exp(-2*w*b/s^2) = exp(-2*1.5*300/289) = 4.44%
This is the risk of ruin if your TRUE win rate is 1.5 bb/100 and...
Forum:
Books and Publications
11-06-2007, 10:14 PM
Replies:
35
The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...
Views:
343
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Example:
Suppose you have played 22,500 hands of 9-handed limit holdem, and you've won 337.5 bets, with a std deviation of
17 bets/100. So your win rate w is 1.5 bb/100,...
Forum:
Books and Publications
11-06-2007, 12:27 PM
Replies:
35
The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...
Views:
343
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...
[ QUOTE ]
From what I have seen of if so far it is defintely a book that is very daunting for the non mathematically minded. I have a mathematics and statistics degree - from a long time ago now and...
Forum:
Small Stakes Shorthanded
08-31-2007, 01:10 AM
Replies:
72
I thought this was supposed to be a good flop...
Views:
329
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: I thought this was supposed to be a good flop...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
a little fact from game theory - in multi street two-person games with multiple raises possible the value of position is negligible. not that it's relevant to the current...
Forum:
Poker Theory
08-16-2007, 03:30 PM
Replies:
21
explain to me the mathematics of a blocking bet
Views:
106
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: explain to me the mathematics of a blocking bet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As is often the case, The Mathematics of Poker explains the concept far better than I could. Blocking bets are a powerful and IMO underappreciated...
Forum:
Poker Theory
08-15-2007, 11:35 PM
Replies:
21
explain to me the mathematics of a blocking bet
Views:
106
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: explain to me the mathematics of a blocking bet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As is often the case, The Mathematics of Poker explains the concept far better than I could. Blocking bets are a powerful and IMO underappreciated tactic, especially on the...
Forum:
Poker Theory
07-11-2007, 08:15 AM
Replies:
21
Sklansky-Chubukov numbers attacked
Views:
128
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Sklansky-Chubukov numbers attacked
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Btw, Chen/Ankenman mention A5s in their on Jam/Fold also, so it seems that these hands do indeed rank very high.
[/ QUOTE ]
I have read and re-read...
Forum:
Poker Theory
06-30-2007, 01:07 PM
Replies:
21
Sklansky-Chubukov numbers attacked
Views:
128
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Sklansky-Chubukov numbers attacked
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Btw, Chen/Ankenman mention A5s in their on Jam/Fold also, so it seems that these hands do indeed rank very high.
[/ QUOTE ]
I have read and re-read that section dozens of...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-30-2007, 07:23 PM
Replies:
5
Adapting the Kelly Criterion to cash NLHE
Views:
65
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Adapting the Kelly Criterion to cash NLHE
[ QUOTE ]
du ~ w^2/B - (w^2+s^2)/2B^2
[/ QUOTE ]
As someone pointed out to me privately, this should be:
du ~ w/B - (w^2+s^2)/2B^2
instead. Later equations are all right, i just...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-24-2007, 04:59 PM
Replies:
22
Which poker variation is most exploitable by pure math strategy?
Views:
109
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Which poker variation is most exploitable by pure math strategy?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No, this is wrong. Headsup Chinese could (I guess) be solved for an equilibrium strategy, but without some mixed strategies your nemesis EV will be higher than it would be if...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-23-2007, 08:04 PM
Replies:
22
Which poker variation is most exploitable by pure math strategy?
Views:
109
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Which poker variation is most exploitable by pure math strategy?
It seems one of the points you were trying to make, which is a good one, was that in regular poker you can make more money by playing in a way that is really bad if they know what you're doing. But...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-23-2007, 07:54 PM
Replies:
5
Adapting the Kelly Criterion to cash NLHE
Views:
65
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Adapting the Kelly Criterion to cash NLHE
[ QUOTE ]
The main two mathematical problems I see with this adaptation are:
1) If you want to play deep stacked (or any fixed stack-to blinds relation for that matter), you have only a few...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-23-2007, 03:55 PM
Replies:
22
Which poker variation is most exploitable by pure math strategy?
Views:
109
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Which poker variation is most exploitable by pure math strategy?
[ QUOTE ]
I want to add something to my statement above (and I am no longer free to edit my post apparently).
With regards to Chinese Poker, it is explotiable in the sense I can develop a...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-17-2007, 11:02 AM
Replies:
9
Jam-or-fold: (near)optimal for stacks up to 10 or 11BB?
Views:
65
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Jam-or-fold: (near)optimal for stacks up to 10 or 11BB?
[ QUOTE ]
Thanks Jerrod, you're right. In the above description I erroneously extended the functional expression for the EV in the jam-or-fold game to the full game.
However, when limited to...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-10-2007, 11:31 PM
Replies:
5
Theoretical Heads Up Limit Holdem Questiom
Views:
55
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Theoretical Heads Up Limit Holdem Questiom
[ QUOTE ]
The real question is - how do we calculate this without empirical results?
[/ QUOTE ]
Easy, take the optimal strategies for both sides for games for all blind levels from like 0 to...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-09-2007, 04:32 PM
Replies:
5
Theoretical Heads Up Limit Holdem Questiom
Views:
55
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Theoretical Heads Up Limit Holdem Questiom
[ QUOTE ]
The game is 100-200 with the live big blind on the button. Opposite from normal. If the small blind completes to 100 instead of folding or raisng, the button can make it 200. No limit on...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-09-2007, 09:51 AM
Replies:
2
Mathematics of Poker-Balancing
Views:
86
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Mathematics of Poker-Balancing
[ QUOTE ]
In the mathematics of poker there is quite a bit of discussion about balancing your play; in the toy games it is shown numerous times that you need to have semibluffs included in your...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-08-2007, 08:44 PM
Replies:
9
Jam-or-fold: (near)optimal for stacks up to 10 or 11BB?
Views:
65
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Jam-or-fold: (near)optimal for stacks up to 10 or 11BB?
[ QUOTE ]
OK, I think I have to refine my argument.
(Yes, stubborn enough to continue to be pretty much convinced that being on the button heads-up constitutes an advantage for any stack size......
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-06-2007, 07:27 PM
Replies:
9
Jam-or-fold: (near)optimal for stacks up to 10 or 11BB?
Views:
65
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Jam-or-fold: (near)optimal for stacks up to 10 or 11BB?
[ QUOTE ]
My intuition must be failing me. I find it difficult to believe that for the full game the equity of the SB on the button can drop to negative values. A hand-waving argument for this is...
Forum:
Poker Theory
05-05-2007, 02:10 PM
Replies:
9
Jam-or-fold: (near)optimal for stacks up to 10 or 11BB?
Views:
65
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Jam-or-fold: (near)optimal for stacks up to 10 or 11BB?
[ QUOTE ]
In "The mathematics of Poker" Chen and Ankenman state:"
"Jam-or-fold is at least near-optimal for stack sizes up to about 10 or 11 blinds"
However, based on some calculculations...
Forum:
Poker Theory
04-17-2007, 07:21 PM
Replies:
6
Quote a Poker authority...
Views:
58
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Quote a Poker authority...
[ QUOTE ]
In Poker Essays 3 Mason explains how higher limit 7 card stud has the proper balance of luck and skill.
[/ QUOTE ]
Does he really say "proper"? I mean, I can see arguing that a game...
Forum:
Special Sklansky Forum
04-16-2007, 11:32 AM
Replies:
76
Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker
Views:
873
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker
[ QUOTE ]
jerrod,
Are we assuming Y knows X's calling frequency and X knows
Y's bluffing frequency on every street? They just don't
know what the other is doing on this hand.
Under those...
Forum:
Special Sklansky Forum
04-16-2007, 11:28 AM
Replies:
76
Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker
Views:
873
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker
[ QUOTE ]
Jerrod, do you and Bill actually play (or aim to play) unexploitably? I mean is it a doctrine as well as a thesis?
[/ QUOTE ]
Pretty much. When I'm against really weak players or...
Forum:
Poker Theory
04-15-2007, 11:31 PM
Replies:
11
Real interesting question
Views:
72
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Real interesting question
[ QUOTE ]
Howard Lederer wrote an article on the Full Tilt website about specialization. He said not to stick to one game- he said to play alot of games because you might find the one your best at...
Forum:
Special Sklansky Forum
04-15-2007, 11:20 PM
Replies:
76
Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker
Views:
873
Posted By
Jerrod Ankenman
Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker
[ QUOTE ]
Not satisfied with my solutions. Solved three one street
games. Then linked the solutions into a series. This is
one game with three streets, not three independent one
street games. ...
Showing results 1 to 25 of 107
Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
>
Last
»
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
Two Plus Two
Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
The Two Plus Two Bonus Program
Special Sklansky Forum
About the Forums
MOD DISCUSSION
Test
General Poker Discussion
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Poker Legislation
Coaching/Training
Stoxpoker.com
DeucesCracked.com
German Forums
Poker Allgemein: Poker in general
Strategie: Holdem NL cash [German]
Strategie: Sonstige
Internet/Online [German]
BBV [German]
Small Talk [German]
French Forums
Forum Francophone
Strategie [French]
BBV [French]
Limit Texas Hold'em
Texas Hold'em
High Stakes Limit
Medium Stakes Limit
Small Stakes Limit
Micro Stakes Limit
Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
Small Stakes Shorthanded
Limit-->NL
PL/NL Texas Hold'em
High Stakes
Medium Stakes
Small Stakes
Micro Stakes
Full Ring
Tournament Poker
MTT Strategy
High Stakes MTT
MTT Community
STT Strategy
Tournament Circuit/WSOP
Other Poker
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Heads Up Poker
Other Poker Games
General Gambling
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Entertainment Betting
Money Making and Other Business Discussion
Internet Gambling
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Affiliates/RakeBack
Software
Poker Site Software, Skins, & Networks
2+2 Communities
Other Other Topics
The Lounge: Discussion+Review
EDF
BBV4Life
Other Topics
Sporting Events
Politics
Business, Finance, and Investing
Travel
Science, Math, and Philosophy
Health and Fitness
Student Life
Golf
Video Games
Puzzles and Other Games
Laughs or Links!
Computer Technical Help
Bin
Sponsored Support Forums
RakebackNetwork
RakeBackDepot
RakeReduction.com Rakeback
PokerSavvy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
07:51 AM
.
Contact Us
-
www.twoplustwo.com
-
Archive
-
Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.