Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Search Forums
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 6 of 6
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Dan.
Forum: Politics 11-27-2006, 11:53 PM
Replies: 28
Views: 128
Posted By Dan.
Re: Voting: a game theory look

[ QUOTE ]
if you want to give a "game theory look" you need to actually define a game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Personal attack deleted The game is a person's decision to vote or not. Funny how everyone...
Forum: Politics 11-27-2006, 11:50 PM
Replies: 28
Views: 128
Posted By Dan.
Re: Voting: a game theory look

[ QUOTE ]
Butso, would you explain yourself?

[/ QUOTE ]
Forum: Politics 11-09-2006, 03:51 AM
Replies: 28
Views: 128
Posted By Dan.
Re: Voting: a game theory look

Definately an excellent analysis. I only disagree with this:[ QUOTE ]
Similar reasoning indicates that no candidate can win by 1 - anyone voting for the loser would rather not vote given what...
Forum: Politics 11-09-2006, 03:45 AM
Replies: 28
Views: 128
Posted By Dan.
Re: Voting: a game theory look

Your post is better directed at Borodog's post. I'm just trying to explain, through game theory, why people vote.
Forum: Politics 11-09-2006, 03:26 AM
Replies: 28
Views: 128
Posted By Dan.
Re: Voting: a game theory look

[ QUOTE ]
What's the original incentive NOT to vote? So that no one votes, as a possibility. I didn't see that.

[/ QUOTE ]

The assumption Borodog set forth is that no one person's vote...
Forum: Politics 11-08-2006, 09:55 PM
Replies: 28
Views: 128
Posted By Dan.
Voting: a game theory look

Borodog's thread inspired me, but I decided to create a new thread to discuss it.

Basically, it's possible that no one vote at all. However, if no one votes, a single person has incentive to...
Showing results 1 to 6 of 6

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.