Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-04-2007, 11:23 PM
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 45
Re: How profitable is a free card play
/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Ok, I knew you've been into STT's for a while now... did you win some huge tourney or something?
Or are you one of hte developers for that software?
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-04-2007, 11:00 PM
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 45
How profitable is a free card play
Assume:
1) I have TPTK and I decide that I'm showing a hand down.
2) My opponent has an OESD and we'll say that he has no other equity for some reason...
I bet, I think we can make him raising...
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes
02-04-2007, 09:51 AM
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 32
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes
02-04-2007, 09:34 AM
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 32
Running it twice
Hmm, this is probably way off topic. If it gets moved to a more appropriate forum that's fine.
Anyways, if your opponent asked you to run it twice, I wouldn't do it if:
-My opponent was...
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-03-2007, 11:35 AM
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 42
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-03-2007, 08:45 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 102
Re: live game straddle
Raising for value is likely possible, but I think I still call here. Folding is Elton John.
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-03-2007, 12:32 AM
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 116
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-03-2007, 12:06 AM
|
|
Replies: 42
Views: 159
Re: I\'m back, bitches
Yeah, I'm sorry for the ninja bump, but I could swear you were drinking heineken at a roman public toilet in pompei.
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 11:51 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 102
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 09:05 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 102
Re: Please help me understand this math problem
ANYWAYS, BACK TO THE MAIN POINT GUYS: IF WE WERE TO IGNORE THE SMALL STUFF, IS THERE A REASON TO RAISE WITH LESS THAN 66% EQUITY (EXCLUDING CHOPS)?
Just from a pure math standpoint, I'm trying to...
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 08:44 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 102
Re: Please help me understand this math problem
Yes, him 3-betting AK does affect the math.
That's why I said "ignoring small factors". So he COULD 3-bet AK, though I'd say that it'd be rare.
He could also intend to call with AK but...
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 08:28 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 102
Re: Please help me understand this math problem
[ QUOTE ]
You assume you're going to call whe he raises, which means you must think that he is raising the river with a worse hand some time and you're not taking that into account in your math.
...
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 08:11 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 102
Re: Please help me understand this math problem
I'm starting with the premise that people aren't going to fold AA for one bet in a 14 bet pot. No one in the threads that I mentioned ever suggested folding, and therefore I would assume this is...
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 102
Re: Please help me understand this math problem
also, "equity" on the river is kinda useless... for example:
say you have 95% equity because the guy is bluffing 95% of the time with air and has you beat the other 5% of the time. Obviously in...
|
|
Forum: Probability
02-02-2007, 06:56 PM
|
|
Replies: 16
Views: 88
|
|
Forum: Probability
02-02-2007, 06:55 PM
|
|
Replies: 0
Views: 76
|
|
Forum: Poker Theory
02-02-2007, 06:53 PM
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 57
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 06:44 PM
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 116
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 06:44 PM
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 48
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2007, 06:43 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 102
|
|
Forum: Brick and Mortar
02-02-2007, 07:43 AM
|
|
Replies: 28
Views: 111
|
|
Forum: Brick and Mortar
02-02-2007, 07:39 AM
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 65
|
|
Forum: Entertainment Betting
02-02-2007, 07:18 AM
|
|
Replies: 10
Views: 199
Re: O\' Canada
83.3%, but I err'ed on the side of things being the same that were quite close together. I think if I tried the test again and really went with my judgement whenever I heard something that wasn't...
|
