Forum: Puzzles and Other Games
12-07-2006, 12:14 AM
|
|
Replies: 157
Views: 566
|
|
Forum: Puzzles and Other Games
12-07-2006, 12:13 AM
|
|
Replies: 157
Views: 566
Re: Backgammon Sign-Up
and another one after i gave you my email address by PM and PM'ed you. I was waiting to hear from you. I am requesting that dmk is eliminated from the tournament on account of this.
|
|
Forum: Puzzles and Other Games
12-07-2006, 12:09 AM
|
|
Replies: 157
Views: 566
Re: Backgammon Sign-Up
why did you write still no word at this point? I responded by PM to you before you wrote this post? did you just want the bye?
|
|
Forum: Puzzles and Other Games
12-07-2006, 12:05 AM
|
|
Replies: 157
Views: 566
Re: Backgammon Sign-Up
hey... i finally got internet back but saw that you guys eliminated me... least you could have done was let vkh know that i was eliminated... or ask him what my status was
|
|
Forum: Puzzles and Other Games
11-23-2006, 01:59 AM
|
|
Replies: 157
Views: 566
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 09:23 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 08:55 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
Re: 33,000 hand checkup
I said it right in the original post. I am not interested in VPIP assessments. Most in postflop play.
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 08:53 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
Re: 33,000 hand checkup
1) They got nasty first.
2) I only said optimal once. What I meant by optimal was that I am able to make more money per hour with 16VPIP at 6 tables than 22-28 or whatever VPIP or whatever at 4...
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:59 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
Re: 33,000 hand checkup
By running badly I meant that I am not doing as well with most of my big hands as I should be based on having many more bad beats than I should have. Thus my win rate isn't what it should be. ...
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:54 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:53 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
Re: 33,000 hand checkup
The fact is that you make a lot more in the top 16% of hands than you do in the remaining 15% or so. So you think I'm that far off when I say that I make more 6-tabling at 16 VPIP than 4-tabling at...
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:48 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
Re: 33,000 hand checkup
[ QUOTE ]
and on your vpip comment... i would cut down on tables and work on moving up instead of 6-tabling 1/2 with a [censored] winrate because i have to play like a huge nit to play 6 tables.
...
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:43 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:35 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
Re: 33,000 hand checkup
I six-table and I find that this VPIP is quite optimal for six-tabling. Much higher VPIP and I wouldn't be able to concentrate on hands.
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:30 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
Re: 33,000 hand checkup
Another thing is this... you said my ASB is too low by about 10-15% but you know, a lot of the equity from stealing the blinds is that your opponents may fold. However, my game selection is really...
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:26 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
Re: 33,000 hand checkup
I don't play only AA or KK. I used a filter.
I am running really badly. This might explain the just call at showdown.
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
07-01-2006, 07:11 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 175
33,000 hand checkup
Hello,
I have played 33k hands on Party $1/$2 6 max.
Any and all comments are welcome...
Please don't say that my VPIP is too low. I play 6 tables and this is pretty much all that I can...
|
|
Forum: Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
04-03-2006, 10:02 PM
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 220
Re: About Multitabling
Bayes rule estimate:
(where W denotes the event that a person is a winning player and M denotes the event that a person is a multitabler)
P[W|M] = P[M|W] * P[W] / P[M]
So let's say 30%...
|
|
Forum: Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
03-16-2006, 02:51 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 229
|
|
Forum: Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
12-26-2005, 03:52 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 517
Re: \"Clarkmeister Theory\"
I haven't taken anything personally, I admit that I made a mistake.
I didn't say that being out of position and being in position aren't two completely different animals. If my wording implied...
|
|
Forum: Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
12-18-2005, 01:08 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 517
Re: \"Clarkmeister Theory\"
Ok, so I misread the position condition.
However, if you change a few wordings based on the position, then I'm still correct.
Change "You must have had a hand that was strong enough to call...
|
|
Forum: Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
12-17-2005, 03:40 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 517
Re: \"Clarkmeister Theory\"
I don't give a junk about the name "Clarkmeister's theorem" or whatever it is, but in this situation there's (at least) one other condition that must be met. It's really important too.
You must...
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Shorthanded
11-22-2005, 10:56 PM
|
|
Replies: 91
Views: 1,137
Re: 190k stat post LC
I can't tell if your'e serious.. but if you are, my advice to you is to start your own private site with no lurkers...
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
04-25-2005, 03:13 PM
|
|
Replies: 203
Views: 2,064
|
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
02-02-2005, 09:01 PM
|
|
Replies: 106
Views: 1,346
|
