Forum: Small Stakes
11-17-2007, 12:18 PM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 49
Re: $200NL QQ Multiway
I guess you can only move yourself in here. His stack size makes your life easy. Since there is no read on the villain. He could very likely have 2 diamonds or T8 here. The second 9 makes 99 a lot...
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-14-2007, 01:21 AM
|
Replies: 15
Views: 118
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 09:36 PM
|
Replies: 18
Views: 525
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 06:23 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 112
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 05:26 PM
|
Replies: 10
Views: 415
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 12:26 PM
|
Replies: 71
Views: 456
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 07:09 AM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 48
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 07:03 AM
|
Replies: 49
Views: 189
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 07:01 AM
|
Replies: 71
Views: 456
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 06:42 AM
|
Replies: 11
Views: 53
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-12-2007, 05:02 AM
|
Replies: 24
Views: 147
Re: Messing with an ABC TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
he is folding every 1 pair hand and thats pretty much villains range.
[/ QUOTE ]
I wish I could find opponents like this
[/ QUOTE ]
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-11-2007, 08:51 PM
|
Replies: 24
Views: 147
Re: Messing with an ABC TAG
Why are people thinking our hand has showdown value?
There is basicaly one hand we beat for this villain to call the turn bet with (88, which is also unlikely coz we hold an 8 in our own hand too)....
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-11-2007, 08:39 PM
|
Replies: 49
Views: 189
Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor
yeah I agree with that 65s is better. Jowever, I think it's tough to call with JJ~99 on this flop without history. A light 3 bettor doesn't fold any Q here for sure. Under these circumstances I like...
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-11-2007, 08:33 PM
|
Replies: 5
Views: 51
Re: AKs stacking off
No one likes a flop 3 bet?
I think it's the cheapest way to define our hand.
There is no flush draw/OESD on this flop
Without particular read I think you can safely fold to a flop 4 bet
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-07-2007, 05:55 AM
|
Replies: 25
Views: 132
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-05-2007, 10:53 PM
|
Replies: 85
Views: 556
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-04-2007, 08:48 AM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 87
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-04-2007, 08:41 AM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 61
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-03-2007, 04:37 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 61
Re: hand vs. scubachuck
I think it's an easy fold. on turn. Does anyone like a flop raise? (To define your hand obv, you still beat a few hands in a LAG's 3 bet range. I don't know Mr.Scuba's stats so I can't really comment...
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-03-2007, 04:31 PM
|
Replies: 21
Views: 408
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-03-2007, 04:06 PM
|
Replies: 17
Views: 78
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-03-2007, 04:04 PM
|
Replies: 17
Views: 78
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-03-2007, 01:15 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 87
|
Forum: Small Stakes
11-03-2007, 11:15 AM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 87
|
Forum: Small Stakes
10-22-2007, 10:06 PM
|
Replies: 23
Views: 308
Re: 200NL - What is \"standard\" here?
With the history (If the villain is aware of that too), I think shoving is the best move. He probably has a weak pair or a draw himself which he can't call an AI bet, but can 4 bet your smallish 3...
|