Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Internet Gambling (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=69985)

miketurner 03-24-2006 08:32 PM

Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
I am looking for 3 & 5 table S&G’s with 10 (or more) minute levels.

After starting hot and turning $50 into $600 in a few months playing $5 & $10 S&G’s... 2 weeks of terrible suck-outs & cold decks...

In a fit of rage, I just withdrew my last $500. I like these games, but need a new place to play for a while. Any suggestions before I download every site looking for a similar structure?

I think UB is similar, but they are getting bad press around here lately. Anything else?

HSB 03-24-2006 08:57 PM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
I think Tilt's are similar but I also think their blind levels are shorter than you're looking for.

miketurner 03-24-2006 09:33 PM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think Tilt's are similar but I also think their blind levels are shorter than you're looking for.

[/ QUOTE ]

I downloaded Full Tilt earlier. 6 minute levels just won't do.

Other ideas?

wonderwes 03-24-2006 09:44 PM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
UB has had bad press, but overall, they are the 2nd best site for SNG's of all types besides Stars. They seemed to have worked out their network issues.

miketurner 03-24-2006 09:49 PM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
[ QUOTE ]
UB has had bad press, but overall, they are the 2nd best site for SNG's of all types besides Stars. They seemed to have worked out their network issues.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? Cool. If I don't get any other suggestions, I'll prolly deposit there. Thanks.

Mangatang 03-24-2006 11:36 PM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
I compiled a comparison of the different site's blind structures for tournaments. UB has one of the slowest blind increases for sit-n-go's. Surprisingly, Pacific has a good structure for sng's too (they use 15 hands per level).

SNG Blind Structure Comparison Chart

HSB 03-24-2006 11:51 PM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
Nice chart

Sarge 03-25-2006 07:03 AM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
UB has had bad press, but overall, they are the 2nd best site for SNG's of all types besides Stars. They seemed to have worked out their network issues.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? Cool. If I don't get any other suggestions, I'll prolly deposit there. Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Does your chart use the old or new PP blind structure?

Sqwrlking 03-25-2006 07:07 AM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
The chart assumes 10 hands in 10 minutes, but you usually get less than 10 at a full table, but much more when you are 3-4 handed.

miketurner 03-25-2006 08:24 AM

Re: Who’s S&G’s are similar in structure to Stars?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Nice chart

[/ QUOTE ]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.