Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Full Ring (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   50 NL | KK (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=552257)

zjaspair 11-22-2007 01:59 PM

50 NL | KK
 
PokerStars Game #13398795054: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2007/11/22 - 12:53:02 (ET)
Table 'Morrison' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: KillingAce ($55.25 in chips)
Seat 2: wamperdam ($34.15 in chips)
Seat 3: ILetUMuck ($50 in chips)
Seat 4: Raiden66121 ($50 in chips)
Seat 6: piscogay ($49.70 in chips)
Seat 7: NaDa112 ($49.50 in chips)
Seat 8: catoujf ($65.20 in chips)
Seat 9: alexisflex ($50.20 in chips)
NaDa112: posts small blind $0.25
catoujf: posts big blind $0.50
Joschelsan: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ILetUMuck [Kc Kd]
alexisflex: folds
KillingAce: folds
wamperdam: calls $0.50
ILetUMuck: raises $2 to $2.50
Raiden66121: folds
piscogay: folds
NaDa112: folds
NaDa112 is sitting out
catoujf: folds
wamperdam: calls $2
*** FLOP *** [8s Td 5c]
wamperdam: checks
ILetUMuck: bets $4
wamperdam: raises $8 to $12
ILetUMuck: no reads...

ship_it_trebek 11-22-2007 02:06 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
Readless I stack off here.

mmctrab 11-22-2007 03:31 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
A check-raise from an unknown on a dry looking board makes me a little nervous, but readless I think I shove here.

Baja15 11-22-2007 04:08 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
[ QUOTE ]
Readless I stack off here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Das Budrick 11-22-2007 04:22 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
http://leggopoker.com/index.php?page=hh

RapidEvolution 11-22-2007 04:32 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
LOL I clicked das's link thinking I was gonna find a hand. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Readless, I probably stack off, but I'm not thrilled about it. On the other hand, enough booboos will do this with AT here to make the shove worth it.

AlexB182 11-22-2007 04:42 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
Bah, I'm not sure if I could do it but I somehow think we're beat here far more often than we're ahead.
Stove results tell something different though, or is this range to wide?

Edit: see stove results in later post, I messed something up in first one...

RapidEvolution 11-22-2007 04:45 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
Include 55 in the range, please. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

AlexB182 11-22-2007 04:46 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
Damn...Second please.

AlexB182 11-22-2007 04:48 PM

Re: 50 NL | KK
 
Doesn't change much ironically...

2,205,917 games 9.484 secs 232,593 games/sec

Board: 8s Td 5c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 67.440% 67.44% 00.00% 1487666 0.00 { KcKd }
Hand 1: 32.560% 32.56% 00.00% 718251 0.00 { TT-55, ATs, KTs, QTs, JTs, T8s, ATo, KTo, QTo, JTo, T8o }


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.