River bluff with low pocket pair
 

CO is 28/15/1.25 on 80 hands. Went to SD 5.88
Give your comments plz

Party Poker, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BB: $24
UTG: $36.62
MP: $54.82
CO: $24.65
BTN: $54.04
Hero (SB): $55.40

Pre-Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB)
UTG folds, <font color="red">MP raises to $0.75</font>, <font color="red">CO raises to $2.50</font>, BTN folds, Hero calls $2.40, 2 folds

Flop: ($6) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">CO bets $3.50</font>, Hero calls $3.50

Turn: ($13) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, CO checks

River: ($13) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $6</font>

Re: River bluff with low pocket pair
 

+1

Re: River bluff with low pocket pair
 

If he folds you were ahead anyway. Id just check call.

Re: River bluff with low pocket pair
 

I don't like it. I think he folded because you just had the best hand.

He might fold AK, AQ, maybe TT. The rest of his 3bet range is calling imo.

Re: River bluff with low pocket pair
 

Fold PF.
Not crazy about the flop call OOP. We're hoping he has AK here and that he shuts down on alot of turns. Check this river. This bet isn't a bluff. It's not pushing out anything that beats us.

Re: River bluff with low pocket pair
 

Why fold PF?
We have big stacks and pretty good implied odds to call

Re: River bluff with low pocket pair
 

[ QUOTE ]
Why fold PF?
We have big stacks and pretty good implied odds to call

[/ QUOTE ]

Preflop fold is pretty standard, you aren't getting the odds to call for a set because you arent deep enough. A good general rule is that you cant call a 3bet purely for set odds when you are 100bb deep.

Re: River bluff with low pocket pair
 

One reason is that MP might 4-bet and then we'll have to fold. Another is that we are OOP so our implied odds go down.

Edit: And ama points out we are effectively 100BB deep against the CO 3 bettor (I read him as the one who is 200BB deep).