Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Full Ring (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=543378)

Split Suit 11-11-2007 03:09 AM

100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
im runnin 13/9/4 on this table after 90hands. UTG+1 is 40/15/2 over the same, and SB is 53/15/3 over the same. im tryying to figure out max value line here (obvi keeping both in wud b ideal. but i havnt the slightest idea what UTG+1 is doin here (logically its KK, but it honestly cud b 77/A9/45o).

whats ur line? (also, SB calls often, but hes not callin a push here lite...hell for sure call the minraise that is already out there)

Full Tilt Poker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 9 Players
LeggoPoker Hand History Converter

UTG: $109.55
UTG+1: $80.25
Hero (UTG+2): $102
MP1: $37.30
MP2: $39
CO: $105.90
BTN: $117.55
SB: $102.05
BB: $99

Pre-Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (UTG+2)
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls $1, <font color="red">Hero raises to $6</font>, 4 folds, SB calls $5.50, BB folds, <font color="red">UTG+1 raises to $11</font>, <font color="red">Hero ???

TRWIII 11-11-2007 03:35 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
*shrugs* I'd actually consider minraising. You said that SB wouldn't call a push light, but what about a nonpush raise? If I wanted to get fancy, this is what I would try and pray UTG shoves. You'd love to see AA vs. AK vs. KK.

Having said this, I'd probably just smooth call and attempt to punish them on a favorable flop.

TRWIII

diebitter 11-11-2007 03:39 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
I think that's AK btw.

don't smooth call, you don't want to give a free 3-way. If it were HU, Id say smoothcall or minraise, but here, I'd raise 3 times his raise, $33.

ASPoker8 11-11-2007 03:43 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
I'd make it $25

We don't have to worry about being exploitable with our small raise because UTG+1 is short and SB is an idiot and its a mistake for him to call $25 with atc

Das Budrick 11-11-2007 03:47 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
[ QUOTE ]
*shrugs* I'd actually consider minraising. You said that SB wouldn't call a push light, but what about a nonpush raise? If I wanted to get fancy, this is what I would try and pray UTG shoves. You'd love to see AA vs. AK vs. KK.

Having said this, I'd probably just smooth call and attempt to punish them on a favorable flop.

TRWIII

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought about suggesting either of these, but I think this lets it go 3way to the flop for too cheap. I'd raise it up and hope they feel like a to make a gambol

Split Suit 11-11-2007 03:49 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd make it $25

We don't have to worry about being exploitable with our small raise because UTG+1 is short and SB is an idiot and its a mistake for him to call $25 with atc

[/ QUOTE ]

i like this idea the best. small enuff to get called, big enuff to "protect" a lil bit.

also, SB never has AK here. like...ever

SABR42 11-11-2007 04:43 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
Make it like $30 to go.

oakrdrzfan 11-11-2007 05:11 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
I dont give the sb a free ride. Even if you take it down now, you have a nice profit. I would rather get this heads up and stack one of them. I pop it up to 33.

BalancePoint 11-11-2007 05:25 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
Raise and try to get hu

ASPoker8 11-11-2007 06:05 AM

Re: 100NL - AA pf against 2 pinks
 
I see no reason to try and get heads up.

Raise and let them both make mistakes.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.