Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

Villian is a TAG reg running at 21/17/2.7 over 5k hands. i have never seen him get out of line yet

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (6 handed) Party Poker Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font>

MP ($422.85)
<font color="#C00000">CO ($198.40)</font>
Button ($91.76)
SB ($193.84)
BB ($229.65)
<font color="#C00000">Hero ($300.23)</font>

Preflop: Hero is UTG with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $8</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $8, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>.

Flop: ($19) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $13</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $43</font>.

Final Pot: $45

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

call, lets see a turn

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

[ QUOTE ]
call, lets see a turn

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

i'd call and fold to turn pressure (barring you hit trips/top two)

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

what are good cards for us on the turn besides the two other jacks (and three other aces, I assume)

since we are calling to "see a turn," there must be some turns we are happy getting it in with, right?

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

Everyone agrees that his range is very polarized here right?

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

[ QUOTE ]
Everyone agrees that his range is very polarized here right?

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm still having a hard time understanding the concept of a polarized range... his range here is either like a set or a bluff, is that what you're saying?

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

[ QUOTE ]
Everyone agrees that his range is very polarized here right?

[/ QUOTE ]

i'd usually say his range is sets/complete bluffs/semi-bluffs (89s/45s). throw in the one 2 pair combo he could have (67s).

basically, I don't see many tags raise the flop here w/QJ type hands.

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Everyone agrees that his range is very polarized here right?

[/ QUOTE ]

i'd usually say his range is sets/complete bluffs/semi-bluffs (89s/45s). throw in the one 2 pair combo he could have (67s).

basically, I don't see many tags raise the flop here w/QJ type hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

so would you assign percentages to each of those possibilities based on number of starting hand combinations?

Re: Party 200NL; TPTK oop vs Reg
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Everyone agrees that his range is very polarized here right?

[/ QUOTE ]

i'd usually say his range is sets/complete bluffs/semi-bluffs (89s/45s). throw in the one 2 pair combo he could have (67s).

basically, I don't see many tags raise the flop here w/QJ type hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

so would you assign percentages to each of those possibilities based on number of starting hand combinations?

[/ QUOTE ]

that would be a start, yes. also helpful is using HUD stats such as the raise c-bet %. (this is assumign no specific read)